The Firm You Go to When the 
Stakes Are High

The Stark Law for Whistleblowers

ALSO KNOWN AS THE PHYSICIAN SELF-REFERRAL STATUTE, THE STARK LAW PROHIBITS CERTAIN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN REFERRING PHYSICIANS AND PROVIDERS OF DESIGNATED HEALTH SERVICES COVERED BY THE MEDICARE OR MEDICAID PROGRAMS. STARK LAW VIOLATIONS ARE A MAJOR SOURCE OF QUI TAM CASES FILED BY WHISTLEBLOWERS UNDER THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT.
The Stark Law was enacted to ensure that physicians make medical decisions based upon what is best for the patient, not what is best for the physician’s bank account.

The conflicts created by certain financial arrangements between healthcare providers can not only compromise patient care, but can also drive up costs by encouraging over utilization of medical services that are billed to Medicare and Medicaid.

To protect patients and the federal healthcare programs, Congress passed a series of laws referred to as the physician self-referral or Stark laws.

As they exist today, the Stark Law prohibits physicians from receiving a financial benefit for ordering, referring, or performing certain types of Designated Health Services (“DHS”). Designated Health Services include:

  • Clinical laboratory services.
  • Physical, occupational and speech therapy services.
  • Radiology and radiation services.
  • Durable medical equipment and supplies.
  • Home health services.
  • Outpatient prescription drugs.
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services.

Entities that provide these services are prohibited from receiving referrals from physicians with whom they have a financial relationship. The financial relationship may be an investment interest or compensation arrangement; it can be direct or through a series of connected entities. Regardless, the financial relationship prohibits the physician from making referrals to the DHS provider. Similarly, the DHS provider is also prohibited from submitting claims to Medicare or Medicaid that are a result of a prohibited DHS referral.

A “referral” may mean ordering a test or sending the patient to another physician. A referral can also include the technical or facility fee billed by a hospital, imaging, or outpatient facility to Medicare or Medicaid.

As if this wasn’t complicated enough, there is a long list of exceptions that allow certain financial relationships that would otherwise be illegal under Stark. A comprehensive discussion of these exceptions is beyond the scope of this article, but a few general rules can help distinguish a legal arrangement from an illegal one.

  • Any compensation to the physician or the physician’s medical group should not be based on or take into account the value or volume of referrals or other business generated by the physician. Again, the physician should not have a financial incentive to refer a patient or order certain medical procedures.
  • Compensation arrangements, except for bona fide employment relationships, must be in writing, have the terms set in advance, and must be for more than 1 year. Payments to physicians that are “off the books” or outside of a written compensation plan often run afoul of Stark.
  • The arrangement should be fair-market value. This means that the physician should not receive more through an arrangement with a DHS provider than would be agreed to by parties in an arms-length transaction where patient referrals are not a factor.

The Role of Whistleblowers

Because the financial arrangements between physicians and other healthcare providers are often confidential or opaque, whistleblowers play a central role in stopping violations of the Stark Law. An arrangement that violates Stark will also cause Medicare and Medicaid fraud if claims generated by the arrangement are submitted to those programs.

The False Claims Act allows a whistleblower to file a claim on behalf of the government for Medicare or Medicaid fraud and receive a percentage of the government’s recovery as a reward for bringing the violations to light. False Claims Act cases filed by whistleblowers for violations of the Stark Laws have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in recoveries and tens of millions in qui tam awards to whistleblowers under the False Claims Act.

Examples of Stark Law Whistleblower Cases

Infirmary Health System (2014)

In July 2014, the government announced that Alabama-based Infirmary Health System agreed to pay $24.5 million to resolve claims that it violated the False Claims Act by paying a group of physicians a percentage of the Medicare payments Infirmary received for tests and procedures referred by the physicians. The whistleblower was awarded $4.4 million under the whistleblower or “qui tam” provisions of the False Claims Act.

Halifax Hospital Medical Center (2014)

On March 11, 2014, the Department of Justice announced that Halifax Hospital agreed to pay $85 million to settle claims that the hospital entered into contracts with six medical oncologists that provided an incentive bonus that improperly included the value of prescription drugs and tests that the oncologists ordered and Halifax billed to Medicare. The settlement also included claims that that Halifax paid three neurosurgeons more than the fair market value of their work. The whistleblower, a former compliance employee of the hospital, was awarded $20.8 million under the whistleblower or “qui tam” provisions of the False Claims Act.

Tuomey Healthcare System (2013)

In October 2013, a court ordered the South Carolina Hospital to pay $237.5 million based on claims that Tuomey provided improper compensation to physicians in violation of the Stark Laws. The whistleblower’s award has not been determined yet pending appeal, but it is likely to equal between 15 and 25 percent of amount the government receives from the hospital system.

Other Potential Stark Issues

Laboratory kickback schemes. It has been reported that some clinical laboratories have paid clinical trial or registry fees to physicians that order testing and enroll patients in a study or registry. Similarly, some laboratories may pay specimen collection, processing, or lab report interpretation fees to physicians or healthcare groups. These payments likely violate the Stark law if the testing claims are covered by Medicare or Medicaid and the payments are based on or take into account the number of services ordered by the physicians.

Academic Medical Centers

Although there is a broad exemption in the Stark Law for certain payments between entities in the academic (medical school) setting, these payments can still run afoul of the Stark Law or Anti-Kickback Statute if the payments exceed fair-market value or are a pretext for incentivizing referrals or other services that are covered by Medicare or Medicaid.

Hospital-physician arrangements and joint ventures

Due to the high reimbursement rates that hospitals receive for certain specialty procedures—e.g., cardiology, neurosurgery, orthopedic procedures, ambulatory surgical center, and imaging services—there is an incentive for hospitals to encourage physicians to refer patients and perform more procedures. Any arrangement that results in a physician receiving substantially more compensation than the amount of professional fees the physician personally generates could violate the Stark law.

Accountable Care Organizations (“ACOs”)

The Medicare Shared Savings Program allows the formation of ACOs, which are groups of healthcare providers that agree to provide quality reporting and share in the risk and rewards of any savings the ACO generates for the Medicare Program. The Department of Health has issued several waivers of the Stark Laws and Anti-Kickback Statute for ACO arrangements. However, any ACO arrangement that seeks protection under the ACO waiver must be publicly disclosed within 60 days and reasonably related to the goals of the Medicare Shared Savings Program. ACO arrangements that violate Stark and do not qualify for the ACO waivers may result in significant damages under the False Claims Act.

If you have knowledge and proof of Stark Law Violations, then give us a call today for a free consultation and case review with an experienced whistleblower attorney.

This information is for educational purposes. It is not offered as and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinions. You should not act or rely upon this information without seeking the advice of an attorney.

WHISTLEBLOWER NEWS

A TEAM COMMITTED TO DOING WHAT IS RIGHT

Find out whether you have a case by speaking to one of our experienced mesothelioma lawyers via our 24/7 toll-free hotline or by submitting an email inquiry. Our attorneys will be quick to respond to you and happy to answer all of your questions.

Know the Difference

Committed to Doing What's Right
  • Over $3 Billion Won

    We have represented numerous individuals and groups of workers, winning for them multi-million-dollar settlements and verdicts.

  • There's No Case Too Big

    Our team has achieved groundbreaking victories in highly complex cases and has gone up against some of the toughest defendants in the country.

  • Trial Attorneys

    Our attorneys excel in the courtroom and are not afraid to bring a case in front of a jury if a fair settlement for the client has not been reached.

  • A Thought Leader in the Industry

    Our firm's knowledge and experience are in high demand, and many news outlets have asked us to share our legal expertise.

  • Access to World Class Resources

    Our experienced attorneys use cutting-edge technology and highly regarded experts to help us achieve the best possible result for our clients.

  • Changing the World for Good

    We not only want to achieve the best possible results for our clients, but we also strive to prevent future harm by changing public health policies.

Thousands of Clients Helped

Hear What They Have to Say
  • They truly made a difference in our lives!

    “Levy Konigsberg went above and beyond in representing my father in his mesothelioma case against multiple parties. From providing a risk free introduction (even flying out at their expense to speak to my father in person) to fighting diligently for us.”

    - Jonathan McNulty
  • Outstanding law firm!

    “Jerry and Bob are not only experts in their field, but genuinely care about their clients. They explain the entire process in a step like manner and are keenly aware that the health and medical treatment of the defendant should not be compromised.”

    - R.M.
  • No need to look any further.

    “The attorneys were attentive to my fathers needs during all proceedings while at the same time aggressive with the defendants making sure my father got everything he deserved.”

    - Todd Allen
  • They were the clear choice!

    “Jerry Block was compassionate and assembled a team of attorneys that knew exactly what to do. Although no amount of money can replace my father, we are grateful to them for giving him the gift of knowing that his family would be taken care of.”

    - Bruce Totterdale
  • Forever grateful!

    “They were not only knowledgeable but also compassionate. It was comforting to know they were diligently working on his case so we could focus on his medical care. Levy Konigsberg became part of our journey and we are forever grateful.”

    - Diane Hoefer
  • The best and brightest!

    “They never failed to keep us informed of all important developments in the case, and they always gave a realistic idea of when the matter would be resolved. I always felt that my dad was excellently represented, and that his case was in the best hands.”

    - Paulette
  • Simply incredible!

    “Corey Stern was simply incredible! Not only did he keep me well informed as to what was transpiring with my case, but was direct and honest all the way through. His hard work and compassion resulted in an amazing settlement.”

    - IBS LMM
  • Knowledgeable guidance and representation.

    “Your firm explained all of the steps involved in filing my case, took the time to update me as it progressed, prepared me for my meeting with NYS officials… Without your knowledgeable guidance and representation, I may not have been successful.”

    - Steven Simon
  • They are good people who want to help you.

    “I am now in a more comfortable financial situation. I can now go out and buy myself the things I need, without worrying how I am going to do that. Because I am well aware that I am not capable of getting or keeping a job.”

    - Edwin Jimenez
  • They won us a lot of money.

    “Levy Konigsberg, in my opinion, is a great law firm. They took very well care of us and I believe that they cared very much about our case. They were great attorneys.”

    - Karen
LEVY KONIGSBERG IN THE NATIONAL MEDIA

CHOOSE LEVY KONIGSBERG

Start with a FREE Consultation
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.