THE FIRM YOU GO TO WHEN THE
STAKES ARE HIGH

“THE SCAFFOLD LAW” – NEW YORK LABOR LAW § 240

Property owners, tenants and contractors are liable for injuries to individuals that a contractor hires for work associated with a property, if the injury occurs as a result of falling objects or from a fall from height.

The Scaffold Law provides a special right of recovery to construction workers who are injured from an elevated risk. It puts the responsibility for a contractor’s worksite safety squarely on the shoulders of the property’s owners, tenants and the contractors who hire the workers. New York courts have broadly defined “fall related accidents” as any change in elevation or contact by falling objects.

The Scaffold Law frequently produces liability and a right of recovery where none would typically exist for the construction worker. This law imposes absolute liability against a property owner, tenants, and contractors. Under the statute, liability is assumed. The only issue to be resolved at trial is the amount of damages. Because of these factors, the issue of whether a case falls within the statute is typically highly contested and is a subject often litigated in appellate courts.

New York Labor Law § 240 is applicable to apartment buildings, commercial buildings, and three (or more) family homes. It is not applicable to one and two family homes. Additionally, the work must be on a structure, which typically means a building, but can also mean rail cars, subway tunnels, water towers, garages, bridges and boats.

The Scaffold Law is also only applicable to very specific types of construction work: (1) erection; (2) demolition; (3) repairing; (4) altering; (5) painting; (6) cleaning; (7) pointing of a building; and (8) erection of scaffolding, hoists, stays, ladders, slings, handers, blocks, pulleys, braces, irons, ropes and other devices. There are other types of labor that are not covered: (1) changing light bulbs; (2) changing pictures; (3) cleaning by a maid; (4) inspection of the construction work in progress; (5) salvage operations; (6) routine maintenance, such as changing HVAC filters, etc.; and (7) installation of drapes.

One way to easily analyze whether you or someone you love may have a claim under the Scaffold Law is to ask yourself whether the incident involved the FORCE OF GRAVITY. The goal of § 240 is protect workers from the dangers associated with gravity, meaning that to apply the statute, the incident must have occurred when the worker fell or when the worker was struck by a falling object.

Find out whether you or a family member has a case by speaking to one of our experienced lawyers via phone at (800) 315-3806 or by submitting an email inquiry. Our attorneys will be quick to respond to you and happy to answer all of your questions.

OUR HIGH-IMPACT CASES

VERDICT IN FOUR MESOTHELIOMA CASES

$750 MILLION

LARGEST MESOTHELIOMA VERDICT IN U.S. HISTORY

$325 MILLION

This case is currently awaiting final review on appeal.

LANDMARK MESOTHELIOMA CASE

$117 MILLION

Landmark Mesothelioma Case

$117 MILLION

Stephen and Kendra Lanzo v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.

Mesothelioma Case

$90.5 MILLION

Johns Manville I

Mesothelioma Case

$47.2 MILLION

Consorti, Luchnick, Pulizzi, Tabolt

Mesothelioma Case

$37.3 MILLION

Douglas Barden et al. v. Johnson & Johnson (“J&J) and Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (“JJCI”)

Mesothelioma Case

$30.3 MILLION

Susan Buttitta v. Asbestos Corp., et al.

Mesothelioma Case

$23 MILLION

City of Baltimore v. U.S. Gypsum et al.

Mesothelioma Case

$22 MILLION

Mayer, Pride

Mesothelioma Case

$19.5 MILLION

Matteson, Lustenring v. AC & S, Inc., et al.

Mesothelioma Case

$18.5 MILLION

New York Brooklyn Navy Yard Consolidated Asbestos Litigation

Mesothelioma Case

$18.2 MILLION

Ronsini, Cardinal, Hoz

Mesothelioma Case

$18.2 MILLION

Gantcher, White, Venturno, Dollas, Mangialomini

Mesothelioma Case

$16.5 MILLION

Florence Nemeth v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels, et al.

Mesothelioma Case

$14.3 MILLION

New York Consolidated Powerhouse Asbestos Litigation

Mesothelioma Case

$14.3 MILLION

Ciletti, McPadden, Greff

Mesothelioma Case

$12.1 MILLION

City of Baltimore v. Owens-Corning et al.

Mesothelioma Case

$10.6 MILLION

Chisholm

Mesothelioma Case

$10 MILLION

Rhodes

OUR PARTNERS

Making a Difference for Clients and Public Health

Levy Konigsberg’s landmark jury verdicts and settlements make a difference in the lives of our clients and the public. Our cases have changed the law to make people safer and resulted in dangerous products being removed from the market. Our attorneys handle a broad range of cases, including cases involving mesothelioma, lead poisoning, water contamination, sexual abuse, pharmaceutical liability, tobacco injuries, toxic chemical exposure, and more. We have been nationally recognized for our long history of achieving record-setting results.

MEDIA APPEARANCES

The attorneys of Levy Konigsberg have appeared as legal analysts on numerous local and national news outlets, including NBC, USA Today, and AP. Our firm has been featured by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and other highly respected publications for our noteworthy case results and numerous successes in high-profile civil litigation matters. We have also been frequently recognized by local news stations and media for our legal achievements and commitment to bettering the communities we serve.

LEVY KONIGSBERG IN THE NATIONAL MEDIA

OUR BLOG

Free Case Review